Differences in Antihypertensive Medication Prescription Profiles Between 2009 and 2021: A Retrospective Cohort Study of CARTaGENE.

Background: Although blood pressure (BP) control is critical to prevent cardiovascular diseases, hypertension control rates in Canada are in decline. Objective: To assess this issue, we sought to evaluate the differences in antihypertensive medication prescription profiles in the province of Quebec between 2009 and 2021. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: We used data from the CARTaGENE population-based cohort linked to administrative health databases. Patients: Participants with any drug claim in the 6 months prior to the end of follow-up were included. Measurements: Guideline-recommended antihypertensive drug prescription profiles were assessed at the time of enrollment (2009-2010) and end of follow-up (March 2021). Methods: Prescriptions practices from the 2 time periods were compared using Pearson's chi-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding participants in which antihypertensive drugs may not have been prescribed solely to treat hypertension (presence of atrial fibrillation/flutter, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or migraines documented prior to or during follow-up). Results: Of 8447 participants included in the study, 31.4% and 51.3% filled prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs at the beginning and end of follow-up. In both study periods, guideline-recommended monotherapy was applied in most participants with hypertension (77.9% vs 79.5%, P = .3), whereas optimal 2 and 3-drug combinations were used less frequently (62.0% vs 61.4%, P = .77, 51.9% vs 46.7%, P = .066, respectively). Only the use of long-acting thiazide-like diuretics (9.5% vs 27.7%, P < .001) and spironolactone as a fourth-line agent (8.3% vs 15.9%, P = .054) increased with time but nonetheless remained infrequent. Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis. Limitations: Specific indication of the prescribed antihypertensive medications and follow-up BP data was not available. Conclusions: Application of hypertension guidelines for the choice of antihypertensive drugs remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for education initiatives. This may be an important step to raise BP control rates in Canada.

Contexte: Bien que le contrôle de la pression artérielle (PA) soit essentiel pour prévenir les maladies cardiovasculaires, les taux de maitrise de l'hypertension artérielle sont en déclin au Canada. Objectifs: Pour traiter cette problématique, nous avons cherché à évaluer les différences dans les profils de prescription de médicaments antihypertenseurs dans la province de Québec entre 2009 et 2021. Conception: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Cadre: Nous avons utilisé les données de la cohorte populationnelle CARTaGENE reliées aux bases de données administratives en santé. Sujets: Ont été inclus les participants qui ont présenté une demande de remboursement de médicament dans les six mois précédant la fin du suivi. Mesures: Les profils de prescription de médicaments antihypertenseurs recommandés dans les lignes directrices ont été évalués au moment de l'inclusion (2009-2010) et à la fin du suivi (mars 2021). Méthodologie: Les profils de prescription des deux périodes ont été comparés à l'aide des tests Chi-Square de Pearson. Une analyse de sensibilité a été réalisée en excluant les participants pour lesquels les antihypertenseurs n'avaient possiblement pas été prescrits uniquement pour traiter l'hypertension (présence de fibrillation auriculaire, cardiopathie ischémique, insuffisance cardiaque, insuffisance rénale chronique ou migraines documentées avant ou pendant le suivi). Résultats: Des 8 447 participants inclus dans l'étude, 31,4 % avait rempli des prescriptions de médicaments antihypertenseurs au début du suivi et 51,3 % à la fin du suivi. Dans les deux périodes à l'étude, la monothérapie recommandée par les directives a été appliquée chez la plupart des participants avec hypertension artérielle (77,9 % c. 79,5 %; P = 0,3), tandis que les combinaisons optimales de deux médicaments (62,0 % c. 61,4 %; P = 0,77) et de trois médicaments (51,9 % c. 46,7 % P = 0,066) ont été utilisées moins fréquemment. Seules les utilisations de diurétiques thiazidiques à action prolongée (9,5 % c. 27,7 %; P < 0,001) et de spironolactone en quatrième intention (8,3 % c. 15,9 %; P = 0,054) ont augmenté avec le temps, mais sont demeurées néanmoins peu fréquentes. Les résultats étaient similaires dans l'analyse de sensibilité. Limites: L'indication précise pour la prescription de médicaments antihypertenseurs et les données de suivi sur la pression artérielle n'étaient pas disponibles. Conclusion: L'application des lignes directrices sur l'hypertension artérielle pour le choix des médicaments antihypertenseurs reste sous-optimale, ce qui souligne un besoin pour des initiatives en matière d'éducation. Cela pourrait constituer une étape importante d'une stratégie visant l'augmentation des taux de contrôle de la PA au Canada.

Is health-related quality of life trajectory associated with dialysis modality choice in advanced chronic kidney disease?

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease have lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL) than the general population. There is uncertainty regarding patterns of HRQOL changes before dialysis initiation. This study aimed to characterise HRQOL trajectory and assess its potential association with intended dialysis modality. METHODS: This prospective single-centre cohort study followed adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for one year. Patients were allocated into one of two groups based on their intended treatment modality, 'home dialysis' (peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis (HD)) and 'other' (in-centre HD or conservative care). Follow-up was for up to 1 year or earlier if initiated on kidney replacement therapy or died. Kidney Disease Quality of Life - Short Form (KDQOL-SF) was completed every 6 months. Predictors of changes in KDQOL-SF components were modelled using mixed effect multivariable linear regressions. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients were included. At baseline, crude physical composite summary (PCS) (45 ± 10 vs. 39 ± 8) was higher in patients choosing home dialysis (n = 41), while mental composite summary (MCS) was similar in both groups. After adjustment, patients choosing home dialysis had an increase in MCS (B = 8.4 per year, p = 0.007) compared to those selecting in-centre HD/conservative care. This translates into an annual increase in MSC by 3 points for the 'home dialysis' group, compared to an annual decline by 5.4 points in the 'other' group. There was no difference in PCS trajectory through time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients choosing home dialysis had improved MCS over time compared to those not selecting home dialysis. More work is needed to determine how differences in processes of care and/or unmeasured patient characteristics modulate this association.

Outcomes of Integrated Home Dialysis Care: Results From the Canadian Organ Replacement Register.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and a timely transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) after PD ends. We compared the outcomes of patients transitioning from PD to HHD with those initiating KRT with HHD. STUDY DESIGN: Observational analysis of the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR). SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: All patients who initiated PD or HHD within the first 90 days of KRT between 2005 and 2018. EXPOSURE: Patients transitioning from PD to HHD (PD+HHD group) versus patients initiating KRT with HHD (HHD group). OUTCOME: (1) A composite of all-cause mortality and modality transfer (to in-center hemodialysis or PD for 90 days) and (2) all hospitalizations (considered as recurrent events). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: A propensity score analysis for which PD+HHD patients were matched 1:1 to (1) incident HHD patients ("incident-match" analysis) or (2) HHD patients with a KRT vintage at least equivalent to the vintage of PD+HHD patients at the transition time ("vintage-matched" analysis). Cause-specific hazards models (composite outcome) and shared frailty models (hospitalization) were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Among 63,327 individuals in the CORR, 163 PD+HHD patients (median of 1.9 years in PD) and 711 HHD patients were identified. In the incident-match analysis, compared to the HHD patients, the PD+HHD group had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.58-1.32]) and hospitalizations (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.41]). In the vintage-match analysis, PD+HHD patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]) but a similar hospitalization risk (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.59-1.24]). LIMITATIONS: Risk of survivor bias in the PD+HHD cohort and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for KRT vintage, the patients transitioning from PD to HHD had better clinical outcomes than the incident HHD patients. These data support the use of integrated home dialysis for patients initiating home-based KRT. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of dialysis with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and subsequent transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) once PD is no longer feasible. It allows patients to benefit from initial lifestyle advantages of PD and to continue home-based treatments after its termination. However, some patients may prefer to initiate dialysis with HHD from the outset. In this study, we compared the long-term clinical outcomes of both approaches using a large Canadian dialysis register. We found that both options led to a similar risk of hospitalization. In contrast, the PD-to-HHD model led to improved survival when controlling for the duration of kidney failure.

A Canadian Commentary on the NKF-ASN Task Force Recommendations on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease.

In 2021, a committee was commissioned by the Canadian Society of Nephrology to comment on the 2021 National Kidney Foundation-American Society of Nephrology Task Force recommendations on the use of race in glomerular filtration rate estimating equations. The committee met on numerous occasions and agreed on several recommendations. However, the committee did not achieve unanimity, with a minority group disagreeing with the scope of the commentary. As a result, this report presents the viewpoint of the majority members. We endorsed many of the recommendations from the National Kidney Foundation-American Society of Nephrology Task Force, most importantly that race should be removed from the estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine-based equation. We recommend an immediate implementation of the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (2021), which does not discriminate among any group while maintaining precision. Additionally, we recommend that Canadian laboratories and provincial kidney organizations advocate for increased testing and access to cystatin C because the combination of cystatin C and creatinine in revised equations leads to more precise estimates. Finally, we recommend that future research studies evaluating the implementation of the new equations and changes to screening, diagnosis, and management across provincial health programs be prioritized in Canada.

Variability in Reporting eGFR at Dialysis Initiation in Canada: A Research Letter.

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis initiation is increasingly recognized as a key quality indicator (QI) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Specifically, guidelines recommend assessing deferral of dialysis initiation until symptoms arise or if the eGFR is ≤6 mL/min/1.73 m2. Despite the recognition of the importance of this QI, how eGFR at the time of dialysis initiation is defined, collected, and tracked at dialysis centers across Canada remains unknown. Objectives: To identify how provincial renal programs define eGFR at dialysis initiation, to compare practice across Canadian provinces, and to determine if there is a consistent benchmark for deferred dialysis start. Design: Cross-sectional survey distributed to the medical leads of each provincial renal program, administered from July 2021 to November 2021. Quebec was not included given it did not yet participate in Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) data submission. Setting: The survey was designed and distributed by the Canadian Society of Nephrology Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee (CSN-QUIS) Indicator Working Group. Methods: The survey asked respondents on how eGFR is defined, collected, reported, and perceived barriers to QI data collection. The National Senior Renal Leaders Forum helped identify the key provincial medical leads to disseminate the survey for completion. Results: Surveys were distributed to the medical leads of the 9 provincial renal programs that participate in CORR. In total, there were 8 responses. Five provinces submit eGFR for all new dialysis starts and 3 provinces only submit this information for chronic patients. There is variation in determining when a patient with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis is classified as a chronic patient. Four provinces use a 30-day trigger, 3 provinces use a 90-day trigger, and the patient's nephrologist makes this determination in 1 province. The creatinine used for the eGFR at dialysis initiation was the value measured on the first dialysis session (ie, day 0) for 5 provinces; the last outpatient clinic creatinine value in 2 provinces, and 1 province did not have a standard definition. Three provinces did not have a benchmark target for eGFR at dialysis initiation, 1 province had a target of <9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, 3 provinces had a target of <10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1 province had a target of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. All 8 responding provincial medical leads support the establishment of a national benchmark for this measure. Limitations: This survey was restricted to provincial medical leads and therefore is unable to determine practice at individual dialysis sites. The survey was not anonymous, so it may be subject to conformity bias. Conclusions: There is wide variability in how eGFR at dialysis initiation is measured and reported across Canada. Additionally, there is no consensus on a benchmark target for an intent-to-defer dialysis strategy. Standardization of target eGFR at dialysis initiation may facilitate national reporting and quality improvement initiatives.

Contexte: Le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) à l'amorce de la dialyse est de plus en plus reconnu comme un indicateur clé de la qualité (IQ) chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT). Plus précisément, les lignes directrices recommandent d'évaluer la possibilité de reporter l'initiation de la dialyse jusqu'à l'apparition des symptômes ou l'atteinte d'un DFGe égal ou inférieur à 6 ml/min/1,73 m2. Bien qu'on reconnaisse l'importance de cet IQ, on ignore encore comment le DFGe est défini, mesuré et suivi au moment de l'initiation de la dialyse dans les centres de dialyse canadiens. Objectifs: Déterminer la façon dont les programmes rénaux provinciaux définissent le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse, comparer les pratiques en cours dans les différentes provinces canadiennes et déterminer s'il existe une cible de référence commune pour une initiation différée de la dialyse. Conception: Un sondage transversal distribué entre juillet et novembre 2021 aux directeurs médicaux de chaque programme provincial de soins rénaux. Le Québec n'a pas été inclus puisque la province n'a pas encore participé au Registre canadien des insuffisances et des transplantations d'organes (RCITO). Cadre: Le sondage a été conçu et distribué par le Groupe de travail sur les indicateurs du Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee de la Société canadienne de néphrologie (CSN-QUIS). Méthodologie: Les répondants au sondage devaient décrire la façon dont le DFGe est défini, mesuré et rapporté, ainsi que les obstacles perçus à la collecte de données sur les IQ. Le sondage a été distribué aux directeurs médicaux provinciaux identifiés par le biais du National Senior Renal leaders Forum. Résultats: Le sondage a été distribué aux directeurs médicaux des neuf programmes provinciaux de soins rénaux participant au RCITO; huit ont répondu. Cinq provinces soumettent le DFGe pour toute nouvelle initiation d'un traitement de dialyse; trois provinces ne soumettent cette information que pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique. Il existe des différences entre les provinces dans la détermination du moment où un patient passe de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë nécessitant une dialyse à l'insuffisance rénale chronique. Quatre provinces utilisent un délai de 30 jours, trois provinces utilisent un délai de 90 jours et dans la dernière province, cette détermination est faite par le néphrologue du patient. Dans cinq des huit provinces sondées, le taux de créatinine utilisé pour établir le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse est la valeur mesurée à la première séance de dialyse (au jour 0); deux provinces utilisent la valeur de créatinine mesurée lors de la dernière visite en ambulatoire, et une province n'a pas de définition normalisée. Trois provinces n'ont pas de cible de référence pour le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse; cette cible est de moins de 9,5 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans une province, de moins de 10 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans trois provinces, et de moins de 15 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans une province. Les huit responsables médicaux provinciaux ayant répondu au sondage appuient l'établissement d'une valeur de référence nationale pour cette mesure. Limites: Ce sondage n'a été envoyé qu'aux directions médicales provinciales, par conséquent, il ne permet pas de déterminer les pratiques en cours dans chaque site de dialyse. Le sondage n'étant pas anonyme, il pourrait comporter un biais de conformité. Conclusion: Il existe une grande variabilité au Canada dans la façon dont le DFGe est mesuré et rapporté au début de la dialyse. On observe en outre une absence de consensus quant à une cible de référence pour une stratégie d'initiation différée de la dialyse. La normalisation de la valeur cible de DFGe au début de la dialyse pourrait faciliter les initiatives nationales de déclaration et d'amélioration de la qualité.

Impact of Successive Office Blood Pressure Measurements During a Single Visit on Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: Analysis of CARTaGENE.

BACKGROUND: Multiple office blood pressure (BP) readings correlate more closely with ambulatory BP than single readings. Whether they are associated with long-term outcomes and improve cardiovascular risk prediction is unknown. Our objective was to assess the long-term impact of multiple office BP readings. METHODS: We used data from CARTaGENE, a population-based survey comprising individuals aged 40 to 70 years. Three BP readings (BP1, BP2, and BP3) at 2-minute intervals were obtained using a semiautomated device. They were averaged to generate BP1-2, BP2-3, and BP1-2-3 for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. Cardiovascular events (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]: cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction) during a 10-year follow-up were recorded. Associations with MACE were obtained using adjusted Cox models. Predictive performance was assessed with 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores and their associated C statistics. RESULTS: In the 17 966 eligible individuals, 2378 experienced a MACE during follow-up. Crude SBP values ranged from 122.5 to 126.5 mm Hg. SBP3 had the strongest association with MACE incidence (hazard ratio, 1.10 [1.05-1.15] per SD) and SBP1 the weakest (hazard ratio, 1.06 [1.01-1.10]). All models including SBP1 (SBP1, SBP1-2, and SBP1-2-3) were underperformed. At a given SBP value, the excess MACE risk conferred by SBP3 was 2× greater than SBP1. In atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores, SBP3 yielded the highest C statistic, significantly higher than most other SBP measures. In contrast to SBP, all diastolic BP readings yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk prediction is improved by successive office SBP values, especially when the first reading is discarded. These findings reinforce the necessity of using multiple office BP readings.

Kidney Biopsy Findings Among Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients With Kidney Injury: A Case Series.

Rationale and Objective: The incidence of kidney disease is high in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT). Although rarely performed, kidney biopsy may be useful to make a precise diagnosis because several mechanisms and risk factors can be involved, and to adjust the treatment accordingly. This case series aimed to report the spectrum of biopsy findings from patients with kidney injury after aHCT. Study Design: Single-center retrospective case series. Setting and Participants: All individuals who underwent a native kidney biopsy, among all adult patients who received aHCT in a tertiary hospital in Montreal (Canada) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, were identified, and the clinical data were extracted from their medical records. Results: A total of 17 patients were included. Indications for biopsy included acute kidney injury (n=6), chronic kidney disease (n=5), nephrotic syndrome (n=4), and subnephrotic proteinuria (n=2). Pathologic findings from the kidney biopsy were heterogenous: 10 patients showed evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), 5 of acute tubular injury, and 4 of membranous nephropathy. Cases of acute interstitial nephritis, BK virus nephropathy, immune complex nephropathy, focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, minimal change disease, and karyomegalic-like interstitial nephritis were also described. Limitations: There was no systematic kidney biopsy performed for all patients with kidney injury after aHCT. Only a small proportion of patients with kidney damage underwent biopsy, making the results less generalizable. Conclusions: Kidney biopsy is useful in patients with kidney disease after aHCT to make a precise diagnosis and tailor therapy accordingly. This series is one of the few published studies describing pathologic findings of biopsies performed after aHCT in the context of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. TMA was widely present on biopsy even when there was no clinical suspicion of such a diagnosis, suggesting that the current clinical criteria for a diagnosis of TMA are not sensitive enough for kidney-limited TMA.

CENtral blood pressure Targeting: a pragmatic RAndomized triaL in advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (CENTRAL-CKD): A Clinical Research Protocol.

Background: Emerging data favor central blood pressure (BP) over brachial cuff BP to predict cardiovascular and kidney events, as central BP more closely relates to the true aortic BP. Considering that patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high cardiovascular risk and can have unreliable brachial cuff BP measurements (due to high arterial stiffness), this population could benefit the most from hypertension management using central BP measurements. Objective: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of targeting central BP as opposed to brachial BP in patients with CKD G4-5. Design: Pragmatic multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial. Setting: Seven large academic advanced kidney care clinics across Canada. Patients: A total of 116 adults with CKD G4-5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min) and brachial cuff systolic BP between 120 and 160 mm Hg. The key exclusion criteria are 1) ≥ 5 BP drugs, 2) recent acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or injurious fall, 3) previous kidney replacement therapy. Methods: Double-blind randomization to a central or a brachial cuff systolic BP target (both < 130 mm Hg) as measured by a validated central BP device. The study duration is 12 months with follow-up visits every 2 to 4 months, based on local practice. All other aspects of CKD management are at the discretion of the attending nephrologist. Outcomes: Primary Feasibility: Feasibility of a large-scale trial based on predefined components. Primary Efficacy: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity at 12 months. Others: Efficacy (eGFR decline, albuminuria, BP drugs, and quality of life); Events (major adverse cardiovascular events, CKD progression, hospitalization, mortality); Safety (low BP events and acute kidney injury). Limitations: May be challenging to distinguish whether central BP is truly different from brachial BP to the point of significantly influencing treatment decisions. Therapeutic inertia may be a barrier to successfully completing a randomized trial in a population of CKD G4-5. These 2 aspects will be evaluated in the feasibility assessment of the trial. Conclusion: This is the first trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using central BP to manage hypertension in advanced CKD, paving the way to a future large-scale trial. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05163158).

Contexte: Des données émergentes favorisent la mesure de la pression artérielle (PA) centrale plutôt que brachiale pour prédire les événements cardiovasculaires et rénaux, car la PA centrale est plus proche de la véritable PA aortique. Les patients souffrant d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) de stade avancé présentent un risque cardiovasculaire élevé, et les mesures de la pression artérielle avec brassard brachial ne sont pas toujours fiables (en raison d'une rigidité artérielle élevée). La prise en charge de l'hypertension à l'aide de mesures centrales de la pression artérielle pourrait donc bénéficier à cette population de patients. Objectif: Évaluer la faisabilité et l'efficacité d'un ciblage de la PA par mesure centrale plutôt que brachiale chez les patients atteints d'IRC de stade G4-5. Conception: Essai pilote pragmatique, contrôlé et randomisé, mené en double aveugle dans plusieurs centers. Cadre: Sept grandes cliniques universitaires de soins rénaux avancés de partout au Canada. Sujets: 116 adultes atteints d'IRC de stade G4-5 (DFGe < 30 ml/min) avec une mesure de PA systolique mesurée par brassard brachial entre 120 et 160 mm Hg. Les principaux critères d'exclusion sont 1) la prise d'au moins 5 médicaments associés à la PA; 2) un épisode récent d'insuffisance rénale aiguë, d'infarctus du myocarde, d'accident vasculaire cérébral, d'insuffisance cardiaque ou une chute avec blessure; et 3) des antécédents de thérapie de remplacement rénal. Méthodologie: Randomization en double aveugle vers une cible de PA systolique centrale ou brachiale (toutes deux à < 130 mm Hg) mesurée par un appareil validé de mesure de la PA centrale. La durée de l'étude est de 12 mois avec visites de suivi tous les 2 à 4 mois, selon la pratique locale. Tous les autres aspects de la gestion de l'IRC sont à la discrétion du néphrologue traitant. Résultats: Faisabilité principale: faisabilité d'un essai à grande échelle fondé sur des paramètres prédéfinis. Efficacité principale: vitesse de l'onde de pouls carotido-fémorale à 12 mois. Autres: efficacité (déclin du DFGe, albuminurie, médicaments pour la PA, qualité de vie); événements (événements cardiovasculaires indésirables majeurs, progression de l'IRC, hospitalization, mortalité); innocuité (faible nombre d'événements liés à la PA, insuffisance rénale aiguë). Limites: Il peut être difficile de déterminer si la mesure de la PA centrale est vraiment différente de celle de la PA brachiale, et ce, au point d'influencer de manière significative les décisions de traitement. L'inertie thérapeutique peut constituer un obstacle à la réussite d'un essai randomisé dans une population de patients atteints d'IRC de stade G4-5. Ces deux aspects seront évalués dans la portion évaluant la faisabilité de l'essai. Conclusion: Il s'agit du premier essai visant à évaluer la faisabilité et l'efficacité de l'utilization de la PA centrale pour la prise en charge de l'hypertension chez les patients atteints d'IRC de stade avancé, ce qui ouvre la voie à un futur essai à grande échelle. Enregistrement de l'essai: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05163158).

A third SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose in people receiving hemodialysis overcomes B cell defects but elicits a skewed CD4+ T cell profile.

Cellular immune defects associated with suboptimal responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination in people receiving hemodialysis (HD) are poorly understood. We longitudinally analyze antibody, B cell, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell vaccine responses in 27 HD patients and 26 low-risk control individuals (CIs). The first two doses elicit weaker B cell and CD8+ T cell responses in HD than in CI, while CD4+ T cell responses are quantitatively similar. In HD, a third dose robustly boosts B cell responses, leads to convergent CD8+ T cell responses, and enhances comparatively more T helper (TH) immunity. Unsupervised clustering of single-cell features reveals phenotypic and functional shifts over time and between cohorts. The third dose attenuates some features of TH cells in HD (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFα]/interleukin [IL]-2 skewing), while others (CCR6, CXCR6, programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1], and HLA-DR overexpression) persist. Therefore, a third vaccine dose is critical to achieving robust multifaceted immunity in hemodialysis patients, although some distinct TH characteristics endure.

Patient views regarding cannabis use in chronic kidney disease and kidney failure: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is frequently used recreationally and medicinally, including for symptom management in patients with kidney disease. METHODS: We elicited the views of Canadian adults with kidney disease regarding their cannabis use. Participants were asked whether they would try cannabis for anxiety, depression, restless legs, itchiness, fatigue, chronic pain, decreased appetite, nausea/vomiting, sleep, cramps and other symptoms. The degree to which respondents considered cannabis for each symptom was assessed with a modified Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1, definitely would not; 5, definitely would). Multilevel multivariable linear regression was used to identify respondent characteristics associated with considering cannabis for symptom control. RESULTS: Of 320 respondents, 290 (90.6%) were from in-person recruitment (27.3% response rate) and 30 (9.4%) responses were from online recruitment. A total of 160/320 respondents (50.2%) had previously used cannabis, including smoking [140 (87.5%)], oils [69 (43.1%)] and edibles [92 (57.5%)]. The most common reasons for previous cannabis use were recreation [84/160 (52.5%)], pain alleviation [63/160 (39.4%)] and sleep enhancement [56/160 (35.0%)]. Only 33.8% of previous cannabis users thought their physicians were aware of their cannabis use. More than 50% of respondents probably would or definitely would try cannabis for symptom control for all 10 symptoms. Characteristics independently associated with interest in trying cannabis for symptom control included symptom type (pain, sleep, restless legs), online respondent {ß = 0.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-1.4]} and previous cannabis use [ß = 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.5)]. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with kidney disease use cannabis and there is interest in trying cannabis for symptom control.

Prediction of Cardiovascular Events by Pulse Waveform Parameters: Analysis of CARTaGENE.

Background Waveform parameters provide approximate data about aortic wave reflection. However, their association with cardiovascular events remains controversial and their role in cardiovascular prediction is unknown. Methods and Results We analyzed participants aged between 40 and 69 from the population-based CARTaGENE cohort. Baseline pulse wave analysis (central pulse pressure, augmentation index) and wave separation analysis (forward pressure, backward pressure, reflection magnitude) parameters were derived from radial artery tonometry. Associations between each parameter and major adverse atherosclerotic events (MACE; cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction) were obtained using adjusted Cox models. The incremental predictive value of each parameter compared with the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease score alone was assessed using hazard ratios, c-index differences, continuous net reclassification indexes, and integrated discrimination indexes. From 17 561 eligible patients, 2315 patients had a MACE during a median follow-up of 10.1 years. Central pulse pressure, forward pressure, and backward pressure, but not augmentation index and reflection magnitude, were significantly associated with MACE after full adjustment. All parameters except forward pressure statistically improved MACE prediction compared with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease score alone. The greatest prediction improvement was seen with augmentation index and reflection magnitude but remained small in magnitude. These 2 parameters enhanced predictive performance more strongly in patients with low baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores. Up to 5.7% of individuals were reclassified into a different risk stratum by adding waveform parameters to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores. Conclusions Some waveform parameters are independently associated with MACEs in a population-based cohort. Augmentation index and reflection magnitude slightly improve risk prediction, especially in patients at low cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular Effects of Home Dialysis Therapies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Currently, thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis for 3 to 5 hours per session is the most common therapy worldwide for patients with treated kidney failure. Outcomes with thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis are poor. Emerging evidence supports the overarching hypothesis that a more physiological approach to administering dialysis therapy, including in the home through home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, may lead to improvement in several cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes compared with thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis. The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative, which has a goal of increasing the use of home dialysis, is aligned with the American Heart Association's 2024 mission to champion a full and healthy life and health equity. We conclude that incorporation of interdisciplinary care models to increase the use of home dialysis therapies in an equitable manner will contribute to the ultimate goal of improving outcomes for patients with kidney failure and cardiovascular disease.

Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Implementation: A Pilot Program From a Large Dialysis Unit in Quebec.

Background: Kidney failure prevalence is increasing in older patients for whom dialysis initiation can be challenging. Assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), where PD is performed with the help of a healthcare worker, can facilitate PD for frailer patients who may not be candidate otherwise. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing the first pilot assisted PD program in Quebec (Canada) and to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of the PD cohort before and after assisted PD availability. Design: Observational retrospective cohort study. Setting and Population: All adult patients initiating PD between 2015 and 2020 in a single-center dialysis unit were included. Measurements: Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with PD were compared between (1) the "pre" (2015-2017) and the "post" assisted PD era (2018-2020) and (2) patients with assisted PD and independent PD in the more recent period. Methods: The primary outcome was peritonitis rate over the first year. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization, transfers to in-center hemodialysis (HD) and mortality. Results: Overall, 124 patients initiated PD with an annual incidence of 17 ± 3 patients during the "pre" and 24 ± 8 patients during the "post" assisted PD era (P = .18). First-year peritonitis rate was similar over the 2 eras. Years of PD initiation and use of assisted PD were not associated with risk peritonitis (over total follow-up) after adjustment. Adjusted hazard of transfer to HD or death was higher during the "post" era (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-5.58). Seventeen patients received assisted PD including 13 (18%) of the 72 patients initiated between 2018 and 2020. Patients with assisted PD were older than those with independent PD (72 [64-84] vs. 59 [47-67], P = .006) and received assistance for 0.8 (0.4-1.5) years. When comparing assisted and independent cohorts, there were no differences in crude rates of peritonitis or hospitalization. Limitations: Single-center study with small sample size. Conclusion: This study shows the feasibility of implementing an assisted PD program, with favorable overall outcomes including similar rates of peritonitis during the first year after PD initiation.

Contexte: La prévalence de l'insuffisance rénale augmente chez les patients plus âgés chez qui l'initiation de la dialyse peut être difficile. La dialyse péritonéale (DP) assistée, soit avec l'aide d'un professionnel de la santé, peut faciliter cette modalité chez les patients fragiles qui, autrement, ne seraient pas candidats. Objectifs de l'étude: Cette étude visait deux objectifs: 1) évaluer la faisabilité de la mise en œuvre du premier program pilote de DP assistée au Québec (Canada) et, 2) évaluer les caractéristiques et les résultats de la cohorte avant et après l'accès à la DP assistée. Conception: Étude de cohorte observationnelle rétrospective. Cadre et participants: Ont été inclus tous les patients adultes ayant initié une DP entre 2015 et 2020 dans l'unité de dialyse d'un center hospitalier. Mesures: L'incidence de la DP, ainsi que les caractéristiques et les résultats des patients sous DP ont été comparés entre [1] les patients « pré ¼ (2015-2017) et « post ¼ DP assistée (2018-2020) et entre [2] les patients sous DP assistée et sous DP autonome au cours de la période la plus récente. Méthodologie: Le principal critère d'évaluation était le taux de péritonite dans la première année. Les résultats secondaires comprenaient hospitalisation, les transferts à l'hémodialyse (HD) en centre et le taux de mortalité. Résultats: En tout, 124 patients ont amorcé un traitement de DP avec une incidence annuelle de 17 ± 3 patients au cours de la période « pré ¼ et de 24 ± 8 patients au cours de la période « post ¼ (p = 0,18). Le taux de péritonite dans la première année était semblable pour les deux périodes. Après ajustement, les années d'initiation et l'utilisation de la DP assistée n'étaient pas associées à un risque de péritonite accru (pour la période totale de suivi). Le risque ajusté de transfert à l'HD ou de décès était plus élevé durant la période « post ¼ (RR 2,77; IC 95 %: 1,42-5,58). Dix-sept patients ont reçu la DP assistée, dont 13 (18 %) des 72 patients initiés entre 2018 et 2020. Les patients sous DP assistée étaient plus âgés que ceux sous DP autonome (72 [64-84] ans c. 59 [47-67] ans; p = 0,006) et ont reçu de l'aide pendant 0,8 (0,4-1,5) an. Aucune différence n'a été observée dans les taux bruts de péritonite ou d'hospitalization lors de la comparaison des cohortes assistée et autonome. Limites: Étude menée dans un seul center, sur un faible échantillon de patients. Conclusion: Cette étude montre que la mise en œuvre d'un program de DP assistée est faisable et qu'elle donne de bons résultats, notamment des taux similaires de péritonite dans l'année suivant l'initiation de la DP.

Lived Experiences of Patients Receiving Hemodialysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study from the Quebec Renal Network.

Background: Hemodialysis patients have faced unique challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. They face high risk of death if infected and have unavoidable exposure to others when they come to hospital three times weekly for their life-saving treatments. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the scope and magnitude of the effects of the pandemic on the lived experience of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 patients who were undergoing dialysis treatments in five hemodialysis centers in Montreal from November 2020 to May 2021. Interviews were transcribed and then analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: Most participants reported no negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on their hemodialysis care. Several patients had negative feelings related to forced changes in their dialysis schedules, and this was especially pronounced for indigenous patients in a shared living situation. Some patients were concerned about contracting COVID-19, especially during public transportation, whereas others expressed confidence that the physical distancing and screening measures implemented at the hospital would protect them and their loved ones. Some participants reported that masks negatively affected their interactions with health care workers, and for many others, the pandemic was associated with feelings of loneliness. Finally, some respondents reported some positive effects of the pandemic, including use of telemedicine and creating a sense of solidarity. Conclusions: Patients undergoing hemodialysis reported no negative effects on their medical care but faced significant disruptions in their routines and social interactions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, they showed great resilience in their ability to adapt to the new reality of their hemodialysis treatments. We also show that studies focused on understanding the lived experiences of indigenous patients and patients from different ethnic backgrounds are needed in order reduce inequities in care during public health emergencies.

Accuracy Difference of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements by Sex and Height.

Importance: Women are at higher risk of cardiovascular events than men with similar blood pressure (BP). Whether this discrepancy in risk is associated with the accuracy of brachial cuff BP measurements is unknown. Objectives: To examine the difference in brachial cuff BP accuracy in men and women compared with invasively measured aortic BP and to evaluate whether noninvasive central BP estimation varies with sex. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study enrolled 500 participants without severe aortic stenosis or atrial fibrillation from January 1 to December 31, 2019, who were undergoing nonurgent coronary angiography at a tertiary care academic hospital. Exposures: Simultaneous measurements of invasive aortic BP and noninvasive BP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex differences in accuracy were determined by calculating the mean difference between the noninvasive measurements (brachial and noninvasive central BP) and the invasive aortic BP (reference). Linear regression and mediation analyses were performed to identify mediators between sex and brachial cuff accuracy. Results: This study included 500 participants (145 female [29%] and 355 male [71%]; 471 [94%] White; mean [SD] age, 66 [10] years). Baseline characteristics were similar for both sexes apart from body habitus. Despite similar brachial cuff systolic BP (SBP) (mean [SD], 124.5 [17.7] mm Hg in women vs 124.4 [16.4] in men; P = .97), invasive aortic SBP was higher in women (mean [SD], 130.9 [21.7] in women vs 124.7 [20.1] mm Hg in men; P < .001). The brachial cuff was relatively accurate compared with invasive aortic SBP estimation in men (mean [SD] difference, -0.3 [11.7] mm Hg) but not in women (mean [SD] difference, -6.5 [12.1] mm Hg). Noninvasive central SBP (calibrated for mean and diastolic BP) was more accurate in women (mean [SD] difference, 0.6 [15.3] mm Hg) than in men (mean [SD] difference, 8.3 [14.2] mm Hg). This association of sex with accuracy was mostly mediated by height (3.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.1-5.6 mm Hg; 55% mediation). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, women had higher true aortic SBP than men with similar brachial cuff SBP, an association that was mostly mediated by a shorter stature. This difference in BP measurement may lead to unrecognized undertreatment of women and could partly explain why women are at greater risk for cardiovascular diseases for a given brachial cuff BP than men. These findings may justify the need to study sex-specific BP targets or integration of sex-specific parameters in BP estimation algorithms.

Mortality Trends After Transfer From Peritoneal Dialysis to Hemodialysis.

Introduction: Transition to hemodialysis (HD) is a common outcome in peritoneal dialysis (PD), but the associated mortality risk is poorly understood. This study sought to identify rates of and risk factors for mortality after transitioning from PD to HD. Methods: Patients with incident PD (between 2000 and 2014) who transferred to HD for ≥1 day were identified, using data from Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation registry (ANZDATA), Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR), Europe Renal Association (ERA) Registry, and the United States Renal Dialysis System (USRDS). Crude mortality rates were calculated for the first 180 days after transfer. Separate multivariable Cox models were built for early (<90 days), medium (90-180 days), and late (>180 days) periods after transfer. Results: Overall, 6683, 5847, 21,574, and 80,459 patients were included from ANZDATA, CORR, ERA Registry, and USRDS, respectively. In all registries, crude mortality rate was highest during the first 30 days after a transfer to HD declining thereafter to nadir at 4 to 6 months. Crude mortality rates were lower for patients transferring in the most recent years (than earlier). Older age, PD initiation in earlier cohorts, and longer PD vintage were associated with increased risk of death, with the strongest associations during the first 90 days after transfer and attenuating thereafter. Mortality risk was lower for men than women <90 days after transfer, but higher after 180 days. Conclusion: In this multinational study, mortality was highest in the first month after a transfer from PD to HD and risk factors varied by time period after transfer. This study highlights the vulnerability of patients at the time of modality transfer and the need to improve transitions.

Home versus In-Center Dialysis and Day of the Week Hospitalization: A Cohort Study.

Background: The dialysis treatment day after the 2-day interdialytic interval (Monday/Tuesday) is associated with a heightened risk of hospitalization for patients on in-center hemodialysis (ICHD). In this national cohort study, we sought to characterize hospitalizations by day of the week for patients receiving ICHD, home HD (HHD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to identify whether there were differences in the probability of a Monday/Tuesday admission for each modality type. Methods: Patients on maintenance dialysis in Canada were analyzed from 2005 to 2014 using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Patients on hemodialysis were categorized as those receiving ICHD, HHD, frequent ICHD, or frequent HHD (the latter two included short daily and nocturnal HD). Hospitalizations were attributed to the previous treatment if they occurred within 30 days of a treatment change. Differences in the proportion of patients experiencing a Monday/Tuesday admission with all other days of the week were compared using a generalized linear model with binomial distribution and reported using adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. Results: Overall, 27,430 individuals experienced 111,748 hospitalization episodes. Rates per 1000 patient days were 3.76, 2.98, 2.71, 2.16, and 2.13 for each of frequent ICHD, ICHD, PD, HHD, and frequent HHD, respectively. Compared with those on ICHD, only patients receiving frequent HHD (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97) and PD (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.97) had a lower odds of experiencing a Monday/Tuesday admission. The OR was lower when restricted to hospitalization episodes for cardiovascular reasons comparing frequent HHD with ICHD (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96). Conclusion: In this nationally representative cohort, we identified that the probability of a Monday/Tuesday admission was lower for frequent HHD and PD compared with ICHD, most notably for hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes. Gaining a better understanding of the reasons behind this observation may help to develop future strategies to reduce overall and cause-specific hospitalization for patients receiving dialysis.